redblog

The Rocchi Files -- Fall Drama Preview Part One!

If Oscar season has a starting gun -- and trust me, it does -- it comes in September with the Toronto International Film Festival and then turns into a marathon, not a sprint, for the next few months as the December 31st deadline for the Academy Awards draws closer. With that in mind, here's part one of a highly subjective list of the Fall's big dramas -- some of which I've seen, some of which I haven't -- as they jockey for Oscar glory, box-office dollars and your attention as fall turns to winter ...

An Education (October 16)

This British drama wasn't on anyone's radar -- until it finally played at Sundance, Telluride and other festivals and earned raves for Carey Mulligan's performance and crowned her the first dead-solid Best Actress Oscar Nomination lock of the year. Mulligan's that good, but it's also a great film, as Mulligan's '60s-era student gets unexpectedly tough lessons in life and love from her relationship with the older Peter Sarsgaard. The whole cast (including Alfred Molina and Emma Thompson) is excellent, and the script -- with High Fidelity and About a Boy author Nick Hornby adapting Lynn Barber's memoir -- is also impressively smart and soulful.

Amelia (October 23)

One of the biggest wild cards of Oscar season -- will audiences want to see two-time Best Actress Oscar-winner Hilary Swank as '30s aviatrix Amelia Earhart, in a drama directed by Monsoon Wedding director Mira Nair? The cast is ridiculous -- including Swank, Ewan McGregor, Richard Gere, and more -- but will the fact we kinda know how the story ends keep audiences away, or draw them in? The script is by Ron Bass -- who also gave us Stepmom and My Best Friend's Wedding -- and Anna Hamilton Phelan of Mask and Gorillas in the Mist, so the film may very well wind up having a mix of history and drama audience respond to -- if they make it to the theaters; at the same time, Amelia has that broccoli-for-dinner, so-good-it's-good-for-you feel to it already, like it's a film you'd watch for extra credit when your 12th grade history teacher had a hangover and wanted to take it easy in class that day. ...

Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire (Nov. 6)

With Oprah's blessing, Tyler Perry's backing and the unprecedented honor of earning the Audience Awards at both the Sundance and Toronto Film Festivals (and also earning raves at Cannes, where I reviewed it), this rough and raw urban drama about a abused teen (Gabourey Sidibe) trying to turn her life around through faith, hope and charity looks poised to be a big player come this Oscar season -- and also has a near-certain guarantee of a best Supporting Actress nomination for comedian-turned-actress Mo'nique as Precious' monster-mother, whose nightmarish cruelty culminates in a searing scene of confession and atonement. It remains to be seen if audiences will eagerly seek out a story that, while it comes around to a heartfelt and earned happy (or happier, at least) ending, involves some very tough stuff involving abuse, poverty and hopelessness ...
 

Up in the Air (Dec. 25)

Another big winner after bowing at Telluride and Toronto (see my Toronto review here), Up in the Air's tale of a corporate downsizing gunslinger (George Clooney) who suddenly has to fight to preserve his own job -- and his soul -- has been earning raves for a nicely-calibrated mix of deft comedy and, yes, real drama. Look for director Jason Reitman to get a nod for Best Director (his second after the breakthrough success of Juno), but if there's any justice, we'll see Clooney and Vera Farmiga (playing a fellow road-warrior who begins a hotels-and-airports romance with Clooney's traveling man) get Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress nods as well. Combine the excellent acting with a great story that makes honest, but never easy, points about our economic crisis and Up in the Air seems to be floating above the pack in the Oscar race already. ...

Nine (Nov. 25)

If any film looks like an Oscar contender at first blush this year, it's Nine -- the big-screen version of a musical that is, itself, an adaptation of a movie. (Confused yet?) Based on Fellini's classic 8 1/2, 9 follows a director (Daniel Day-Lewis) dealing with life, love and art - and the 9 women who have shaped him as lovers, friends and more. Daniel Day-Lewis alone makes this worth watching, but the cast gets even more impressive when you look at the leading ladies playing his lovers and family -- including Nicole Kidman, Marion Cotillard, Judi Dench, Sophia Loren, Kate Hudson and Penelope Cruz. (Normally, the complaint is that there aren't enough good roles for female actresses in Hollywood; expect the joke this year to be that there are good roles for actresses in 20009, but they're all in one film. ...) Directed by Rob Marshall of Chicago, it remains to be seen if Nine will earn a Chicago-style reception at the Oscars ... or a Dreamgirls-style snub. ...

(Which of these are you most looking forward to? And come back next week for the Fall Preview Part 2, with The Road, Brothers, and other Oscar contenders. ... )

Close-up Poster! The LAST Swag-Bag Contest of the Month!

Well, we've come to the end up September, and today we're handing out the remaining three of our very special movie goodies swag bag prizes. (In honor of redblog's one-year anniversary and the 500 millionth DVD rental at redbox!)

If you haven't won a goodie bag prize yet this month, these are your last three chances!

For the final time this month, I give you... The Rules!

- The first three people (who haven't already won any redblog contests this month) to enter in the correct title of the movie shown in the poster below will win goodie bags from redbox. 
- One entry per person
- Submissions must include an email address (in the email address field, NOT in the body of the comment) so we can contact the winners and get their mailing addresses. Unless you foolishly put your email in the body of the comment for all to see. Which we just told you not to do. If you'd really rather not give us your email address you are still welcome to play--you just won't get a special swag-bag if you win.
- Once you've won a goodie bag this month, you cannot win another one.
- Only US-based readers can receive prize bags. Sorry, but we can't be sending the swag all over the world. Or even to Canada.
- You must be over 18 to win a swag-bag. The lawyers said so.

So if you have not already won a bag, here's what you do: Below is a close-up bit of the original poster for a famous movie. All you have to do is be one of the first three people to enter the correct title of the film in the comments section below this post.

I won't post any of your guesses until I put the answer up and announce the winners tomorrow.

So have at it!

I'm Brave Enough to See Paranormal Activity... Are You?

If you've been reading redblog for any length of time, you know that I am staunchly anti-scary-movie.  I purposely seek out films that feature wizards and hobbits and frat boys doing silly things in Vegas and intergalactic space battles -- I want nothing less than total escapism when I go to the cineplex or pop in a DVD.  So you might be surprised to hear that I've purchased tickets for an upcoming midnight screening of Paranormal Activity -- an indie that is supposedly The. Most. Frightening. Film. Ever... so much so that even The Beard himself, Steven Spielberg, freaked out after watching it.

Have I done lost my mind?  Why would I intentionally put myself through an experience that has the potential to scar me for life... that might forever haunt me with images I won't be able to erase from my mind?  I really have no answer for these questions except, "I just have to see what all the fuss is about." 

On that note, before I go any further, you should take a look at the trailer for Paranormal Activity if you haven't caught it already.  Don't worry, there's nothing gory or crazy-scary in it -- it mostly shows audience reactions and just a few clips from the film, which was pulled together in one week three years ago for less than $15,000.

So what do you think? By seeing this film, am I setting myself up for an epic mental breakdown and ensuring that I will never sleep again?

Here's why I'm not that worried: I don't believe in evil poltergeists.  I believe in aliens and friendly ghosts (yes, like Casper) and magical creatures and a whole lot of other things that most people find ridiculous and silly, but I don't believe in murderous, I'm-going-to-mess-with-you-when-you're-most-vulnerable ghoulies.  I'm an extremely light sleeper, and if some dark force was trolling around my condo in the wee hours, I would've caught onto it by now.  So I simply don't think that anything in Paranormal Activity could be that bad, or bad enough that I will go from not believing in wicked spirits to suddenly jumping six feet in the air when I hear the floor creak in the middle of the night. 

My dear fellow redblogger Locke has tried to bring me to my senses and has forewarned me that now might not be the best time for me to start acting all brave.  He'll be seeing the movie this weekend, too... so if you never hear from either of us again, you'll know that it really was horrific and we were both scared speechless (in the "no longer can type, either" sense).   But I'm clinging to the hope that watching Paranormal Activity in a sold-out theater at midnight is going to be a memorable pop culture experience that I don't want to miss out on, and not one that's going to irrevocably damage my psyche.

As a result of Paramount Pictures' very creative (and smart, in my opinion) marketing campaign for this film, it's currently expanding into twenty additional cities this weekend (up from twelve college towns).  You can see where it's playing here, and if it looks like there are no plans for it to show in your area and you are eager to see it, you can join the over 230,000 people who have used Demand It! (the first time this tool has ever been leveraged for a movie) and let your voice be heard.

Here's to hoping that after seeing Paranormal Activity I'll still be able to resume my redblogging duties on Monday...

Tuesday Threes: The Answer (And Yep, More Prize Winnas!)

Persistence pays off, people! Paul's been in there for the past week or so swinging away at the various contests, and today he pulls down a win--and a swag bag! Likewise yougotiger also gets her first September win, and a bag o' movie goodies. Congrats, both of you! Wait patiently next to your e-mail boxes--an official redbox Prize Commissioner (also known as Erika) will be contacting you soon to get your mailing addresses.

If you still haven't won a movie goodies swag bag, you have one more chance to win one of two prizes in this afternoon's Close-up Poster contest. It's the last giveaway of our September celebration of one year of redblog and the 500 millionth DVD rental at redbox. (But don't worry, we may be able to round up a few more prize bags in the future--just not for every single game.)

As for the Threes, if you're having trouble figuring out what film featured Ricky Gervais (starring this  weekend in The Invention of Lying), Robert De Niro, and Michelle Pfeiffer, just sprinkle a little magic celestial powder over the Inviso-Text below! (Or highlight it, that works too.)

Yes, it was the delightful and woefully overlooked Stardust, director Matthew Vaughn's 2007 adaptation of Neil Gaiman and illustrator Charles Vess's book. If you haven't seen Stardust, treat yourself to it asap, especially if you like The Princess Bride--it's a similar mix of romance, wry humor, and imagination. Vaughn is the Guy Ritchie associate who produced Lock Stock and Snatch, directed Layer Cake (the very Richie-esque crime film that gave us all Daniel Craig) and the up-coming Kick-Ass. He'd been set to direct X-Men 3, but dropped out for various personal and creative reasons. Instead he did Stardust, but possibly because of the X-Men fiasco, the film was unfairly treated on its release as damaged goods or an afterthought. (Don't weep too much for Vaughn--he's married to Claudia Schiffer.)

Stardust stars Claire Danes as a literal fallen star and Charlie Cox as the villager who sets off into a fantasy world with her to... well, it's complicated. Just check it out for yourself. Meanwhile, Gervais, hot off his Office triumph, had a small part as the comically shady merchant Ferdie the Fence. De Niro was Captain Shakespeare, leader of a band of air pirates (they steal lightning) and keeper of some amusing secrets of his own. Michelle Pfeiffer is the delicious villain of the story, a grand and wickedly glamorous witch in the classic tradition of Snow White and Cinderella.

Not yet sold on Stardust? How about Peter O'Toole? And Mark Strong (the standout performer from last year's Body of Lies and this winter's Sherlock Holmes)? And Ian McKellan narrating? That do it for ya?

The Education of Charlie Banks

The two easy takes on The Education of Charlie Banks are: a) Jeez, this Jesse Eisenberg is in everything these days and always playing the same Michael-Cera-ish character! And b) The first feature film directed by Limp Bizkit bad-boy lead singer Fred Durst? It has to suck in unimaginable (and un-creative) ways!

Well, I’ve liked Eisenberg since first seeing him in Roger Dodger. He’s excellent in films like The Squid and the Whale and Adventureland, and is a hoot in this weekend’s Zombieland. But I also get the criticisms. He’s not a star yet and he’s already got his stock character down pat: earnest but confused, good guy but sometimes selfish, sheepish but charming, all lines delivered while backing away as if they were fade-away jump shots. And Charlie Banks is his third ‘80s-set piece after Squid and Whale and Adventureland.

As for Durst, Charlie Banks is technically his debut film (completed in 2007), although his second—The Longshots—was released first, last fall. Mock all you want, but Durst is the real deal as a filmmaker. He’s not showing any deep cinematic genius yet, and in an attempt to shake off his aggressive, cloddish nu-metal-rap image he goes a bit too far and too sentimental in the other direction. But he’s making an solid, honest effort to tell complex, thoughtful stories about human nature and behavior and is succeeding to an admirable extent.

The Education of Charlie Banks follows the title character (Eisenberg) out of Greenwich Village to an East Coast college in the early ‘80s. Charlie is the Full Eisenberg: stammering, yearning, somewhat self-serving, and easily shaken. When Mick (Jason Ritter), a swaggering thug/bully/alpha male from the old ‘hood shows up on campus, the film becomes a study in class aspirations and conflict, the nature of violence, anger management, and redemption.

Durst makes no bones about his inspirations: Jim Carroll and Charles Bukowski are name-checked, Hannah Arendt’s "banality of evil" gets taken out for a classroom spin, and there’s a Raging Bull movie poster neatly displayed on a dorm room wall. But the most obvious touchstone is The Great Gatsby (by way of some Bret Easton Ellis). Up from the streets, Mick takes a liking to Fitzgerald’s masterpiece and soon fancies himself staring at the green light on East Egg. Charlie plays the Nick Calloway role, mostly standing by, watching, worrying. And of course, Mick’s bad-boy routine quickly nabs him Mary (Eva Amurri), the Daisy Charlie had his eye on.

Your Tuesday Threes

Ready for some Threes?

We're winding down our special September but don't worry, we're still giving out gift goodie movie swag baggies to the first two winners of this Threes game. It's in celebration of redblog's one year anniversary and redbox's 500 millionth rental.

But this is the last Threes with swag prizes. Tomorrow we'll have a Close-up Poster contest with swag bags, but then Thursday it's back to the good old homemade construction-paper medals. Which means only two more days of The Rules:

- One entry per person
- The first two people to submit the correct entries will win goodie bags with movie-related items from redbox
- Submissions must include an email address (in the email address field, NOT in the body of the comment) so we can contact the winners and get your mailing address to send you your swag.  Don't worry, your email address will not be shown on the site, as email addresses entered into the appropriate field never are. Unless you foolishly put your email in the body of the comment. Which we just told you not to do. If you'd really rather not give us your email address you are certainly welcome to still play--you just won't get a special swag-bag prize if you win.
- Once you’ve won a contest (that is, finished in the top two) you cannot win another goodie bag on redblog during the month of September. But even if you've won, you're welcome to play and snag the always enviable homemade construction-paper medal.
- Only US-based readers can receive prize bags. Sorry, but we can't be sending the swag all over the world. Or even to Canada.
- You must be over 18 to win a swag bag. The lawyers said so.

So, that having been said, here's how it goes:

I give you three actors, you tell me what film all three were in together.

Enter your guess in the comments section directly below this post, and if you are one of the first two players with the correct answer you will win the surprise swag bag!

I won't publish any guesses until tomorrow when I put the correct answer up.

What film featured:

Ricky Gervais

Robert De Niro

Michelle Pfeiffer

It's Never too Early to Start Thinking about Christmas, Right? (OK, Maybe it IS Way too Early to be Thinking about Christmas. I Still Need a Halloween Costume.)

The overnight temperature dropped to forty degrees here in Chicago, so of course I'm completely panicking and am in the process of hauling out snow boots and puffy jackets because surely the first blizzard is going to hit before the end of the week.  I will not be unprepared!

Since Mother Nature has forced me into the winter state of mind,  I thought today would be an appropriate time to discuss the newest trailer for Robert Zemeckis and Disney's A Christmas Carol.  You may remember that Locke had the opportunity to not only hear Zemeckis speak about the film, but also get a sneak-preview of some scenes back in July, and he was (much to his own surprise) pretty impressed.

Now the rest of us have a chance to pass judgment!

So what did you think? I thought it was... interesting. I'm such a sucker for Dickens' timeless tale that I'll probably see this no matter what, and I do believe that the scenes shown above will be extra-cool in 3D, but I'm not entirely sold on the overall look -- it was kind of freaking me out.

We're going to run a Film 101 installment that focuses on performance-capture technology at some point before A Christmas Carol debuts November 6, so stay tuned for details about how the Jim Carrey you've come to know and love was transformed into Ebenezer Scrooge. But until then, I'm going to crank up the heat in my condo (how un-Scroogelike of me, huh?) and hope that I even make it to November without freezing solid in front of my laptop.

The Winners of the Branded Entertainment Idea Contest!

Boy, this was a tough one. If I could, I'd give out a dozen or more prize gift bags--you guys really knocked yourselves out with some great ideas.

The challenge was for us--in the midst of Hollywood's obsession with "branded entertainment" like Battleship and Barbie--to come up with more childhood games, toys, foods, etc that we could spin into movie pitches and make bazillions of dollars from.

Alas, I only have three swag bags to give away, and they are going to:

Suzanne for Slinky (Yes, Wills mentioned Slinky first, but Suzanne really ran with the idea): Slinky vs... The giant slinky er, uh, slinks over tall buildings and through the city in a quest to fight ...whatever wrong it is trying to right. Or, Slinky's Adventures. Slinky in the Country, Slinky in the City, Slinky at the Park, Slinky on Vacation, Slinky in Space. His girl and his boy, who find joy just playing with Slinky are cast with him in each episode. Maybe they can visit historical places and thus making the original and sequels educational. Of course he should start with the Washington Monument or the Empire State Building of someplace with lots of steps!

Tanisha Smith for Kid Sister - The psychological thriller / dark comedy. What happens when kid sister decides that she wants everything that you have. High-school setting. It would be a cross between Single White Female and Very Bad Things. The awkward genius sister does everything in her power to ruin the life of her adoptive big sister while seemingly unaware of her unattractive over-sized head. The obsession becomes deadly, but her head remains gigantic.

emoticripple for Chet Hawk, Pet Rock: A Hard Place, a Brett Ratner film. Homicide detective Chet Hawk is two weeks from his third half-life and looking forward to retirement when he is faced with a sudden rash of brutal chippings and related vandalism. When seemingly unrelated pebbles of violence are revealed to be a landslide of conspiracy dating back to Stonehenge, the situation threatens to rip a deep crevasse in the foundation of the community. Will this immeasurable environmental pressure metamorph Los Granulus into a volcano of molten malice, or can Chet return his city to a half-life of sedimentary ease? Shot in 3D stop-motion. Chet Hawk voiced by Bruce Willis; all other roles performed by Michael Clarke Duncan and Harvey Fierstein.

Suzanne, Tanisha, and emoticripple, stand by--an official redbox prize commissioner (Erika) will soon be contacting you to get your mailing addresses.

But kudos to you all for your delightful and clearly money-making ideas! I want to give special shout outs to a few others that were right up there.

Some of you went short but sweet and I giggled a lot at the notions of movies based on Shrinky Dinks (Brad), Jenga (Smrithi chakkalakal), sea monkeys (Kristi Collins), and a barrel of monkeys (Kathy Pettit). Honestly, Kristi--all joking aside, I'm not so sure you couldn't pitch a Sea Monkey Movie to a studio and get the green light.

Others that deserve a shout out: Jose O'canas Jr.'s OPERATION starring Jim Carrey with a body full of odd items; Natalie R's Crank 3: Pogo Stick of Death was not only a hilarious idea and a detailed plot/trailer outline, but best of all, I could totally see the Crank film makers using the idea for Crank 3; Meg Liese's Rice Krispies Chronicles setting the cereal elves in a Seven-like serial killer mystery; Thomas Hendrix and ricky montoya for their Mousetrap ideas--though be sure to check out Gore Verbinski's 1997 Mousehunt; Paul's elaborate Rock, Paper, Scissors (starring, of course, Dwayne Johnson), and Ann Franco might be onto something with a Chess movie, though I'm disappointed no one (including myself) could come up with an exciting movie based on Checkers. (UPDATE: After I'd published this, a few more good entries rolled in. It was too late to win anything, but kudos to Tony Perez for his Twister pitch and Heather for her take on Hungry Hungry Hippos!)

And there were so many other good ones--please hop back over to the original post and check them out!

Thanks to everyone for playing, and more than that you've proven to me we can do more of these kinds of "movie pitch" games in the future!

Hot (and I Do Mean Hot) off the Presses: Three New New Moon Posters

I turned on my laptop and what did I see?

Three smoldering New Moon posters staring back at me!

(I felt like being all rhymey today, OK?)

The first features the Cullen clan with Edward and Bella in a Could They Be Any Closer? embrace.  It's enough to make all the rumormongers go wild with "Well, That Means They Are Definitely Together in Real Life!" speculation.  (Sorry to be the one to break it to you, peeps, but they're never going to admit to anything.)

The next features Jacob and the rest of his buds looking all menacing.

But are they more menacing than the Volturi? I don't think so.

I gotta say, that between these posters (the Volturi one is my favorite) and the new trailer, my expectations are nearing the danger zone of "too high." Yes, New Moon will probably be a vast improvement over Twilight, but it's probably still going to be pretty laughable in parts... especially if Jasper continues to wear that ridiculous look on his face that seems to have carried over from the first film.

Battleship, Barbie, and "Branded Entertainment"

[NOTE: THE CONTEST AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POST HAS ENDED, BUT FEEL FREE TO CONTINUE TO SUBMIT IDEAS FOR FUN]

Much cheeky hay has been made lately over the Hollywood trend of turning childhood games and toys into major motion pictures.

First there was the official announcement that, as we noted here months ago, Peter Berg will be directing a movie version of the Hasbro game Battleship for Universal. I had hoped his Battleship would be set during the heyday of the battleship, but instead it looks like it will be a modern setting with "super" ships, a la the G.I. Joe movie.

And then last week it was announced that Universal is also moving ahead with Mattel to make a live-action Barbie movie. Also, the He-Man movie, which had briefly been homeless after being dropped by Warners, found a new home and life at Sony.

As I've said before with the remake of Excalibur, the real question on these projects is why Battleship? Why Barbie? If Berg had a genuine desire to make a Navy movie (and he seems sincere in his dedication to the idea), why not just make a movie about ships and call it, um Ship Attack? Or War at Sea? 

Of course, it's a silly, obtuse question. We all know why. Because Universal especially is going whole hog over this notion of "branded entertainment." Meaning you get projects out there that have built-in name recognition and the majority of your marketing and awareness work is done. (For example, me writing about these projects.) The studio also has Stretch Armstrong and Candyland in the works, while others are tackling the ripe creative fields of Monopoly and Legos.

But rather than curse this typical "marketing over quality" approach as I usually do, I've decided if you can't beat 'em, pitch 'em. I'm going to start coming up with my own million-dollar franchise ideas based on childhood games, toys, foods, etc to sell to the studios!

For example:

Bubble Yum: Blowing Back in Time! -- In this brightly colored childhood movie, our middle-aged hero finds that he can travel back in time simply by chewing big, soft Bubble Yum gum--the bigger the bubble the further back he goes! But when he ends up back in the early ''70s before the invention of Bubble Yum, he must help the wacky creator of the chewing gum come up with the top secret soft no-stick formula or be stuck (hur hur) forever in the Age of Nixon. (Franchise sequels will focus on Bubblicious and Hubba Bubba adventures.)

Paste: An Edible Odyssey -- Our young heroine is mocked for her love of digesting the wheat-based glue during crafts hour. But will her friends still be laughing when she embarks on a year-long quest to make a gourmet meal every day centered around her beloved white goop?

Super Ball: The Movie --More than just a rubbery romp, I see this as a poignant coming-of-age story. A brother and sister have amazing adventures with the irrepressible Super Ball (voiced by Robin Williams), but must face some of life's harder realities when "SB" bounces down the heating vent. Think of it as a vulcanized polymer version of Ol' Yeller.

************

AND NOW THE CONTEST!

I think I'm off to a good start here, but I need your help! We need more ideas, more toys, games, fun foods, or just childhood objects we can turn into gazillion dollar movie projects. (Sorry no TV shows or cartoons for this contest.) And as if the prospect of selling these ideas for huge piles of cash isn't enough impetus, we'll also toss in three redbox movie-swag gift bags for the best three ideas. (In celebration of September being the one-year redblog anniversary and the 500 millionth redbox rental.)

Your idea can be as short or complex as you like--you can just submit the name of the game/toy or you can come up with a rough plot or even casting.

Just enter your idea in the comments section below this post and I'll choose my three favorite ideas tomorrow.

Until then, look! Rules!

- A panel of judges (namely me) from redbox will be determining the five winners, and their (my) decision is final.

- Submissions must include an email address (in the email address field, NOT in the body of the comment) so we can contact the winners and get your mailing address to send you your loot. 

- Past goodie bag winners may submit an idea but cannot win another prize.  Winners of this contest will not be eligible to win another goodie bag on redblog during the month of September.

- We WILL be publishing entries as they come in.  If you have the same idea as someone else, I'll be looking to see who was the most creative with it.

- All contestants must live in the U.S. and be over the age of 18.

- Only submissions entered into the comments section immediately below this post -- and not any other post -- will be considered.

All right, let's hear your Branded Entertainment ideas!