In Theaters Review of One Day: An unforgettable tale of a decades-long friendship (rather the sweeping romance its posters make it out to be), the adaptation of David Nicholls’ internationally adored novel doesn’t quite live up to its source material, but does succeed in perhaps the most important way: like the book, it subtly and not-so-subtly reminds its audience that life usually doesn’t go as planned.
It’s impossible to describe how nervous I was to see One Day. I’m viciously protective of my favorite books, and David Nicholls’ brilliant novel upon which One Day is based made my Top Five Favorite Books of All Time list late last year. Another title that appears on that shortlist is Audrey Niffenegger’s The Time Traveler’s Wife, and I remember how much it pained me to see critical parts of that novel drastically changed or compromised for its 2009 big-screen adaptation. I feared the same thing would happen again with One Day.
The good news is that Nicholls himself wrote the screenplay, which drops in on Emma Morley (Anne Hathaway) and Dexter Mayhew (Jim Sturgess) every July 15—starting in 1988 when they first meet on their college graduation day (get ready to cringe at their outfits), and ending over 20 years later in the present (let’s just say that Dex’s hard-partying ways lead him to age much more noticeably than Em). Sturgess is brilliant as the wealthy, cocky, selfish, and often clueless Dex. It’s easy to believe that any woman—even one as smart, strait-laced, and grounded as Emma—would forgive this guy for his transgressions again and again and again because he’s precisely the kind of irresistible “innocent bad boy” that could pull off such a feat.
Another reason why Emma’s able to continue her relationship with Dex over the years is because that relationship is almost entirely platonic. I can’t help but think that most moviegoers who haven’t read the book will be surprised by how little Em and Dex are together together. The film’s marketing makes it out to be an epic love story, which it is in a way, but it’s more like an epic friendship story, where the friendship just so happens to be between a male and female. Sure, Em and Dex have been attracted to each other since 1988, but the brilliance of both Nicholls’ book and the adaptation is how they ring so true to real life.
Movies—especially romances—don’t usually reflect “the way it is.” But One Day gets it right. Its message is that your soul mate may be your best friend, but being someone’s best friend isn’t always pretty and doesn’t happen instantaneously. That special someone could be the person who helps you look at the bright side of working a crappy waitressing job for years, or who gives you hope that your spectacular flame-out on live TV really isn’t the end of your career, or who can look you in the face and tell you when you’re being an idiot, or whose voice is the only one you want to hear after tragedy strikes. Em and Dex do these things for each other… while they’re attached to different people (and in Dex’s case, quite a long list of different people).
What’s missing from the film is the inner monologue that readers of the book were privy to—Em and Dex’s voices, which revealed that the two did have conflicting feelings for each other all along. For the film, Nicholls had no choice but to cut out several subplots that gave a stronger sense of who Em and Dex were, both individually and together. On top of those cuts in the screenplay, director Long Scherfig (An Education) chose to let us draw our own conclusions about what might be going through Em and Dex’s minds. Hathaway and Sturgess are able to convey a lot through just a solemn look, a longing glance, a brow furrow or an exasperated shrug, but they can’t overcome the lack of character and relationship depth that results from trying to cover two decades of the pair’s lives in less than 110 minutes. (That’s not even six minutes per year, mind you.)
Since I’m such a huge fan of the book (will you just trust me and read it already?), I can’t be sure that my enjoyment of the film version isn’t partially attributable to my memories of what else I remembered happening between its main characters. What I do know is that I thoroughly expected to be fuming by the time the end credits rolled, and instead breathed a huge sigh of relief: the uplifting feeling and profound sense of hope that Emma and Dexter’s story gave me when I read Nicholls’ novel eight months ago was preserved, if not expanded upon, in Scherfig’s version of One Day.
One Day is currently in theaters across the country.
—
Redbox movies from the cast of One Day:
- Anne Hathaway in Love & Other Drugs
- Jim Sturgess in The Way Back
- Jim Sturgess as the voice of Soren in Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole
- Patricia Clarkson in Legendary



Posted on August 21, 2011 at 11:06 am
Erika, just curious what the other books on your Top 5 of all time are. I am always looking for a good book!
Posted on August 24, 2011 at 6:56 pm
I loved this movie! I had seen it on opening day…
It isn’t one of my favorites due to it misses A LOT of what is in the novel and of course, they changed quite a few things: Em and Dex at Tilly’s wedding, instead of a maze — they go on the balcony to talk.
Hathaway’s performance is sort of predictable. She is shy that she seems afraid of Dex (her insecurity is worse in the movie, in my opinion). But my favorite performance is Sturgess! He’s handsome and his performance is never predictable. He keeps you guessing till the end of what he’ll do with his life. Of course, he’s messed up practically all the way through until he’s sober with Em.
I was expecting A LOT from this movie because of the director Lone Scherfig. But it seems like David Nicholls (screenwriter and writer of the book of the same name) and Scherfig doesn’t seem like they cared about Em’s character…Scherfig to me only seemed to care about the setting and Dex’s character.
I think this film needs to be much improved. Depicting the novel better and getting deep with Em’s character.
No offense to the movie, the director, to Erika, this is well worth a Redbox rental. I would say to people who read the book, you may want to see it in theaters if you are expecting a lot from the film adaptation however in the end you may be in a big disappointment.
I and the person who I went with (also read the book) was in a disappointment with quite a few things with this film adaptation however we still enjoyed the movie.