“The Best Novel of the Decade” (or of 2005, at least) Gets the Hollywood Treatment

by Erika Olson | Jul 27th, 2010 | 2:30PM | Filed under: Redbox Focus, Trailers

Considering that we’re making it a point to discuss literary adaptations this week, when I saw the poster for the big-screen version of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go, my first instinct was to immediately perform a Google search to get some confirmation that Time magazine had in fact declared this novel The Best of The Decade. It turns out that there is no (easily found) proof of this — and several other blogs have made note of the liberties taken on the film’s poster. The magazine’s list of the 100 Top Novels of All Time includes other books in NLMG‘s decade (like Atonement and The Corrections), so no one’s quite sure how Ishiguro’s book catapulted past the others. So what’s the lesson here? You better be honest in your marketing, Hollywood studios! Or else everyone’s going to fixate on the claims you make in your posters instead of building positive word of mouth about the movie you’re trying desperately to promote.

All of this negative-ish buzz is a darn shame, because otherwise I really like the poster. While I adored the author’s excellent The Remains of the Day, I’ve not yet read Never Let Me Go.  (Though I will remedy that before the film is out in limited release in mid-September.) Even so, I felt the spot above was strong because the letters breaking apart at the end seem to signify that despite the title’s plea, a relationship does unravel. I also have respect for the fact that the marketers didn’t feel the need to splash huge close-ups of Keira Knightley and It Girl Carey Mulligan (one of my faves, hooray!) across the page; they instead did the exact opposite.

I dug the trailer even more.

So now’s the time when I admit to doing something extremely lame and (in my mind) deplorable. Starting with the brief flash of the kids tapping their wrists on a scanning device at the -1:50 mark and continuing throughout the rest of the trailer, I got the sense that this was not your average romantic-triangle drama. It seemed like there was an undercurrent of sci-fi goin’ on. So do you know what I did? I went and read a recap of the book (even though I already have it on order, mind you) and totally ruined the whole thing for myself. I’m so mad that I did this. I almost always can control my urge to give in to spoilers that I know must exist in the world. Alas, this time I caved. (At least now I understand what the breaks in the letters on the poster represent.)

But don’t worry, I’m not going to spoil any of you. In fact, I urge you to stay in the dark if you haven’t yet read the novel. Because even though I now know what happens, I’m still curious to see how it’s handled on the silver screen. Since Never Let Me Go was a huge bestseller, I’m assuming there are quite a few of you out there who’ve read it — and therefore talking about the details of the plot IS allowed in the comments section. Have at it! Since I’ve already established Keira, Carey and soon-to-be Spider-Man Andrew Garfield in my mind as the main trio, I of course have no chance of forming other visuals in my head when I read the book, so I’d especially love to hear what you think about the casting choices.


5 Responses to ““The Best Novel of the Decade” (or of 2005, at least) Gets the Hollywood Treatment”

  1. millar74
    Posted on July 27, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    e- thanks for the words of wisdom. i was so intrigued by the trailer that i actually opened another tab to search and find a synopsis of the book. i only stopped long enough to finish up your take on the trailer. whew. crisis adverted. i’ll definitely be checking out the novel and the movie.

  2. KtownBen
    Posted on July 30, 2010 at 8:35 am

    The film looks good and really close to the novel. The story’s a real tear jerker and it looks like they’ve really captured it. I wouldn’t call “Never Let Me Go” the “novel of the decade” by any stretch but it was good and I hope the movie comes close to it for quality.

  3. Ryan Adams
    Posted on September 1, 2010 at 9:48 am

    it’s not easy to find, Erika, but here it is:

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1949837,00.html

    Books

    1. Never Let Me Go (2005), by Kazuo Ishiguro
    2. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell (2004), by Susanna Clarke
    3. The Corrections (2001), by Jonathan Franzen
    4. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (2007), by Junot Diaz
    5. The Known World (2003), by Edward P. Jones
    6. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2003), by J.K. Rowling
    7. Atonement (2002), by Ian McEwan
    8. Lush Life (2008), by Richard Price
    9. Then We Came to the End (2007), by Joshua Ferris
    10. American Gods (2001), by Neil Gaiman

  4. Erika Olson
    Erika Olson
    Posted on September 1, 2010 at 10:06 am

    Wow, Ryan, thank you so much! I really, really appreciate this — you are the ultimate web-searcher!

    As it were, I just finished reading Never Let Me Go two days ago. Now I need to put some of these other titles on my To Read list.

    - Erika

  5. Ryan Adams
    Posted on September 1, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    I had a heck of a time finding it too. Had almost given up, but a couple of readers on the movie site where I write kept insisting they had seen TIME’s Decade of All Kinds Of Top 10 Randomness. Didn’t want to deal with one of those smart-alecks triumphantly throwing the link at me, so I kept digging.

    I think the key to unlatch Google’s hidden chamber was to search for “best books” instead of “best novels”. Though I have to say, any list of Best of the Decade is dubious if it fails to mention ‘The Road’ or ‘Life of Pi’ or ‘White Teeth’.

    or the Twilight Saga. (kidding!)

Post a comment

Comments are moderated and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information:

Rate this Movie:

  • Currently 0/5 Stars
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

(mouse over the stars to rate the movie and click to set your rating)