I'm working on my full Avatar review, and will hopefully have it up tomorrow. But as I go over my notes and thoughts on James Cameron's movie, I realize there are a lot of things to address that have little to do with the actual film itself.
Way back last summer, well before Avatar's release, Interweb geek-dom was already lining up on opposite sides of the Avatar line. Like a sort of religious war being fought via snarky or just plain profane comments, e-mails, and tweets, the sides seem to break down something like this: Based on trailers and early preview footage, you were required by Geek Law to feel one of two things about Avatar.
1) It was going to be The Greatest Movie Ever, one that would effectively blow all other cinematic memories right out the back of your brain, change the medium of film forever, and leave you gasping and flopping on the theater floor like a goldfish on the carpet, with what was left of your cerebral cortex melted into a heap of joyous fanboy Jell-O by the Return of the Master.
Or 2) It was going to be a ridiculously cliched video-game mishmash of Ferngully, Delgo, and Dances With Wolves as played out by giant Smurf elves with bows an arrows. (Officially codified into the pop culture zeitgeist, as so many things are, by South Park.)
As often happens when folks get themselves worked up, there was no middle ground allowed. If you said you thought Avatar looked interesting and was visually stunning, but the Na'vi looked cartoonish and you were worried the dialogue and story might be a bit clunky, you were instantly set upon as a Heretic Hater who dared defy the True Return of J.C.
All of this is understandable–the fanboy excitement over Cameron's Avatar doesn't have as much to do with the film itself (which is why I'm talking about it here, rather than in my review tomorrow) as it does with the simple human need to Have Something to Look Forward To. I was as guilty of this as anyone eight years ago when Fellowship of the Rings came out. It's fun to rev your motor up over some piece of upcoming cinematic fantasy–it's part of the joy of being a Film Geek.
But ironically, my big question a month ago was whether all this Film Geek quivering, salivating, pants-wetting anticipation for Avatar was crossing over into mainstream filmgoers. Most non-geek friends and family I asked about Avatar a month ago responded with some combination of "What is it? Is it based on a cartoon? Is it a video game? It looks kinda silly. What's it about?"
Well that concern can be put to rest, much to the relief of the 20th Century Fox marketing department. Fox premiered Avatar last week in London and also showed screenings to critics nationwide like Erika, James, and myself in advance of awards season voting. (The ploy worked perfectly in New York and LA, where the New York Film Critics Online chose it as their Best Picture and it was nominated for a Golden Globe.) Despite very strict embargoes, reviews began popping up everywhere and quickly the floodgates broke–and the majority of those reviews were positive. (The Fox review embargo was officially lifted this past Monday.)
This fall the media narrative on Avatar had been: Did Fox spend half a billion dollar on a massive flop? (Or was it "only" $400 million? Accounting estimates vary and in certain circles have become as heated as the fanboy arguments over the appearance of the Na'vi.) And somewhere in the back of that question was the quiet refrain, "yes, but isn't that what everyone was asking about Titanic in the fall of '97 before it opened?" I think we can now all write the second half of the story even before Avatar's opening weekend box-office numbers come in Sunday afternoon.
In the past week, buoyed by those mostly positive, sometimes ecstatic reviews, the fanboy-and-girl world has reignited into anticipatory geek-gasms. Now that the film has been seen and praised by some, the question the Geek Inquisition is turning on its peers is "Were you a naysayer? Did you doubt? Did you not show sufficient enough faith this summer and fall? If so, to the rack, and heat up the irons!" And if you've actually seen Avatar, liking it is not enough. By the Law of Hype, you must say that everything we know about cinema has been changed forever or you are branded a heretic. Saying that it's a half-billion dollars worth of visually stunning action excitement with a ten-cent brain will get you tossed in the dungeon. Suggesting that it's two hours of very impressive shininess sprinkled over two hours and forty minutes of summer popcorn fluff will have you drawn and quartered.
All of this has those who have not yet seen Avatar looking ahead to Thursday night at midnight as if it's going to be some combination of the moon landing, Woodstock, and their wedding night… only in blue… and in 3-D CG. Which is fine–the Northern Hemisphere ancients created winter solstice celebrations intentionally to give people festival events to cheer them up as the days get shorter, darker, and colder. If something big and pretty and shiny like Avatar gives us something to get geeked out on for a week or two this winter, then that's fine.
Nor would I worry about getting your expectations too high–like most religious experiences, Avatar will give you back just about whatever lofty dreams you have for it. If you go in expecting to have your vitreous humor boiled, your mind blown, and your chakras realigned then most likely your self-induced fervor will help Cameron's massive film do so. If you go in expecting a couple of hours of dazzling escapism and cool action, the film certainly delivers that on the spectacle level. If you go in expecting Cameron's usual ham-hearted, tin-headed, self-important level of cliches dipped in cheese, you'll certainly find plenty of that as well. Like the Oracle at Delphi or the Wizard of Oz, Avatar will most likely give you whatever you want to believe in.
Of course, after next week the big question is going to be, will Avatar win the Best Picture Oscar? For the record, I'm going to say yes. Not because it's a great film or the best film of the year, but much more to do with the fact that the Academy exists almost solely on revenue from the TV ceremony broadcast rights. And those TV broadcast ratings will go sky high if a big, popular, box-office crushing movie like Avatar is in there stomping all the competition to death, rather than some small indie film about kids living in the slums of Mumbai. (After all, that was the Academy's entire argument for expanding the Best Picture field to 10 instead of five films.)
As for Avatar the film, I'll get to that tomorrow in my full review. But suffice to say that just about everything both sides of the Geek Camps hoped for or feared is in there. (Not to be all whoo-hoo lookit me, but I don't feel I was wrong about much when I wrote my impressions back in August based on the 16 minutes of footage shown.) In the meantime, you might as well sit back, get in line, and enjoy the hype. The circus is coming to town. And it's blue. And 12 feet tall. And does funky stuff with its tail.
Posted on December 16, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Avatar, not my kind of film that I would not absolutely see in the theatre nor rent at the dearest Redbox kiosk. A lot of people have been hyped up about “A James Cameron Film” Avatar, he does better with Titanic more than this delio.
It’s in theatres December 18 for the people who would want to see Avatar!!!! Oh thank goodness that “Did You Hear About the Morgans?” come out that day also, that film saves the day because I really want to see that one than this one Avatar.
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 8:00 am
Personally I’m not really interested to go see Avatar, and no one I have talked to will see it, but I suppose it is not as hyped here in Sweden. Looking forward to your review though.
(By the way I’m going to have quotes from Monty Python’s “Spanish Inquisition” sketch stuck in my head thanks to all the torture talk :)
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 9:32 am
What the hell is a review embargo!? And how is it even possible?
By the way, Locke, I can tell you didn’t like it with all those nasty hateful negative comments you made! Shunnnnnnnthe nonbeliever! Shun! Shuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnahhhh! (/sarcastic charlie the unicorn reference)
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 10:05 am
Sorry, Fiirvoen, didn’t mean to get all “inside baseball” with the critic terms.
When we are shown screenings of films by studios in advance of their release, we are almost always “embargoed,” meaning we are not to publish our reviews or even tweet or otherwise mention our opinions usually until the day of the film’s release into public theaters.
It’s part of the agreement of getting to see the films early–if you regularly break the embargoes, you get taken off the screening lists and no longer get to see stuff early. Not anything sinister, just the way business is done. On the other hand, there are certain publications (*coughVarietycough*) that get away with breaking embargoes regularlly, which is sometimes frustrating.
However, while it is very helpful to see films early (and essential for being able to do the Friday morning KPAM radio appearances), my interest as a critic has never at all been to be the “first” out there with a review of a new film. That sort of exclusivity just doesn’t interest me.
And I think you were being sarcastic (I love Charlie the Unicorn!), but yes I DID like AVATAR–with some heavy caveats and qualifications. :)
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 10:09 am
I really want to side with option 2 for this movie.. When I first heard of the film coming out I was super excited it was the Nickelodeon live action version of Avatar! But.. I was sadly mistaken. That movie will come out way later, and this movie.. Well, what IS this movie? I still barely know what it’s about, and though it may have great special effects and 3d, it doesn’t look like a story I would enjoy. And might I add, I dislike that Rodriguez actress very, very much.. to the point where I wonder how she could land a role in a movie that will supposedly do very well. I don’t know anyone that really wants to see Avatar, but I guess I will wait on reviews to see if it is really worth seeing..
I may just wait for Redbox to get it =)
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 10:22 am
Believe me, Aly, you are not alone in your dislike of Michelle Rodriquez, although I personally don’t mind her. But she’s surprisingly good and likable in AVATAR.
As for waiting to watch it on DVD, while there’s no doubt a lot of people will be re-watching Avatar on TV for years to come, if there was EVER a film you HAVE to see in the theaters (and in 3-D if possible), this is IT. In fact, a LOT of Cameron’s PURPOSE in making Avatar was to pioneer a level of visual technology that would bring people BACK into the theaters. And he certainly did THAT–Avatar is so big, so pretty, so visually stunning, you really do want to see it on as big a screen as possible.
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 10:36 am
Hmm.. I didn’t think of it that way, Locke. Though I dislike Rodriquez (I spelled it wrong the first time), I still doubt I will like her in the movie, BUT that does not stop me from watching things with her in it. Sometimes you need a character like hers.. I guess? Either way, I didn’t think of it in the way of 3d. I have never been a fan of using the 3d glasses and watching a movie.. It usually bothers me or gives me a headache, but I do agree that some amazing effect movies should rather be seen in theater. I really need to know more about the movie first, I think, to have any motivation to see it.. So I suggest you post your review as soon as possible!! For now, I want to see The Morgans movie.. I wonder how it will hold up against Avatar? Ha!
Posted on December 17, 2009 at 3:32 pm
This film Avatar is overated, personally.
This freaking film is a turkey that makes everyone hyped up and this isn’t even released yet, you people who want to see it-please wait until tomorrow December 18!
Oh people, didn’t you know there are like three films that are coming out tomorrow and all of them are new releases, we got coming our way “Did You Hear About the Morgans?”, “Planet 51″ and this one “Avatar”.
I’m more excited about the comedy “Did You Hear About the Morgans?” and “It’s Complicated”.
Thank you for the write-up Locke.
Posted on December 18, 2009 at 10:05 am
Avatar was an enjoyable movie, and I will go and resee it in 3D Imax, because I want to do the film and Cameron true justice to how he envisioned the film (I saw it in the regular edition). Though even without the glasses, I truly was amazing at how stunning the picture was, and had to stop a few times and be awed at how real the whole thing looked.
Rodriguez has been cast-typed, in reality, what movie have we seen with her where she isn’t playing this kind of character? In Avatar I really enjoyed her character, especially during the final conflict and her choice lines that got the audience I was with cheering and laughing.